As a high school student in Milton, Massachusetts, Luke Nourie took a class in biotechnology and thought, “Wow, I love this. This is what I want to do.” He could see himself pursuing a college degree tied to the field, which drives the booming economy of the Bay State and provides over 63,000 jobs.
After reading about Clark University in Colleges That Change Lives and learning that Clark was ramping up its life sciences programs, he enrolled in the fall of 2013. The next year, he took a Genetics course with Robert Drewell, a molecular biologist who had just arrived from Harvey Mudd College and had published extensively in scientific journals.
Now a senior majoring in biochemistry and molecular biology, Nourie is a member of the interdisciplinary research team led by Drewell, associate professor of biology, and Jacqueline Dresch, assistant professor of mathematics. He’s received funding via a LEEP fellowship in 2015 and a departmental fellowship last summer. Most importantly, he has developed his own project, with the goal of publishing an article in a scientific journal as a lead author. He’s examining the twin of eyeless gene involved in eye and brain development in fruit flies; mutations of the corresponding Pax6 gene in humans can lead to hereditary eye diseases or improper brain development in the fetus.
“When I knew I wanted to do research, I fully expected to be in the lab working on a professor’s research or with a graduate student,” Nourie says. “I never thought I would be designing and working on my own project, for which I had conceived the idea, come up with the big research question and designed my own procedures, all with the goal of generating a publication.”
Undergraduate experiences like Nourie’s are integrated into Drewell and Dresch’s research, something the National Institutes of Health recognized when it awarded the professors a $450,900 Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA R15) Program grant for their interdisciplinary three-year project “Decoding cis-regulatory grammar at Hox genes.” An R15 grant requires investigators to involve student undergraduate researchers, something Dresch and Drewell already have been doing for years.
“Both of us were given the opportunity to be involved in research at an early stage of our career, and we saw that as invaluable,” Dresch says. “Being able to give that experience to our students is really important. A lot of what undergraduate research is about is getting your feet wet, seeing what research is, seeing what it means to work on open-ended questions and getting a feel for whether that is what you want to do with your life.”
Undergraduate students are very actively involved in the professors’ research on Hox genes, which control the complex cellular development of animals from head to tail. The genes regulate, or “decide,” which embryonic cells will turn into a liver, a brain or another organ.
“We want to figure out how you build a complex biological organism, starting with a single-cell in the fertilized egg and, through development, how that becomes a complex system consisting of billions of cells,” Drewell says. “At the molecular and cellular level, we’re interested in trying to figure out how that process is regulated, how it’s controlled and how you coordinate this activity of not only generating all those cells but also integrating all these different activities into this complex, multicellular organism.”
As for “decoding cis-regulatory grammar,” Dresch puts it this way: “We understand DNA, and we know the letters — the As, Cs, Gs and Ts — that make up the genome, but what we don’t understand is what those sequences mean. If we were archaeologists, we would say that we have discovered the Rosetta stone, we have the letters, we have some of the basic rules of the language, and now we just have to decipher what it’s actually telling us.”
To understand cellular development in living organisms, the professors study fruit flies, or Drosophila, because they are “relatively simple in comparison to humans, and they have fewer genes, a smaller genome and pretty-well-understood development,” she says. Hox genes in both Drosophila and humans are “evolutionarily conserved,” which means they’ve remained relatively unchanged over time.
“The genes at work in Drosophila are exactly the same genes used by more complex organisms to control development,” according to Dresch. “If we can understand the regulation of Hox genes in fruit flies, it can contribute to our understanding of those very same genes in humans.”
And by understanding normal cellular development, researchers can gain insight into abnormal growth — something that has implications for genetic diseases, including cancer. Abnormal activity of Hox genes in the human fetus, for example, has been implicated in neonatal spinal and neural diseases.
From the ResearchMatters Archives:
"Supercomputers power a biology revolution at Clark"
Meanwhile, Drewell stresses that he and Dresch are preparing their students for an ever-evolving, highly competitive environment that forces researchers to work outside their comfort zone and base of knowledge.
“Modern research in the life sciences is no longer best served by being truly excellent at one subject,” he says. “The questions now are so complex that you can’t just be a biochemist or a geneticist or part of any other single field. So we want our students to start this process of starting to think and use approaches across the disciplines. We try very hard to introduce them to the practice of doing that.”
Traina Scholar Rachel Orlomoski ’17, a biology major, chemistry minor and member of the Drewell-Dresch team, conducts research in the lab of Donald Spratt, assistant professor of chemistry and biochemistry and the Carl J. and Anna Carlson Endowed Chair in Chemistry. Spratt’s lab features state-of-the-art lab equipment — including a high-speed centrifuge and a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer — to isolate and purify proteins.
Orlomoski’s project deals with Drosophila’s FTZ protein, which binds to the DNA in Hox genes and transcribes genetic information into RNA, as a single cell develops into a full-blown fruit fly.
Like all of Drewell and Dresch’s students, Orlomoski also uses mathematics in her research.
“A stereotype of biologists is that they’re generally terrified of math and avoid it whenever possible, and that’s been relatively true for me since I started college,” she admits. “But seeing how Drewell and Dresch explain math in relation to biology has dissipated some of that distaste for the subject for me. Research requires a lot of forethought and planning, and considering how to look at a problem from both a math and biology perspective is extremely useful.”
But why apply math and computer science to research on cellular development in the first place?
“Cellular development is not just about cells dividing,” Dresch explains. “A lot of it is about cells being regulated and differentiating at very, very precise locations and points in time. For mathematicians, understanding the functionality and complexity behind this system is very appealing.”
For that reason, she and Drewell focus on training students in bioinformatics, where math and computer science converge with biology in analyzing big data. Drewell is director of Clark’s new Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics Concentration Program. They hold weekly meetings so the entire team of undergraduate and graduate students — drawn from biology, biochemistry and molecular biology, math, computer science and economics — can learn from and weigh in on each other’s research.
“Rob and I often think of our collaborative research as a constant circle; there is no beginning and no end,” Dresch says. “What we are doing in bioinformatics feeds back to the biological experiments, and that again informs the questions we are asking in math and computer science.”
For students, the training in bioinformatics, as well as the exposure to other disciplines, is invaluable.
“Right now, you can’t think about doing biology or biochemistry research without a computational approach,” says LEEP fellow Arianna Brugnola ’18, who worked alongside Nourie in Drewell’s lab last summer and now is developing her own research project in biology.
As he looks at Boston’s booming biotech field, Nourie recognizes that “bioinformatics is becoming a major player. They’re hiring a lot of people who know bioinformatics and know how to code. I think it will be really helpful when I go to apply for a job and say I have experience with this tool and that tool.” He has been accepted into Clark’s fifth-year program for fall 2017 and later plans to apply to Ph.D. programs.
Although math and computer science majors may have more experience using quantitative methods, they also benefit from learning bioinformatics as part of a real-life research project. Michael Gaiewski ’18, a mathematics and economics double major, and Navid Al Hossain ’18, a math and computer science major, worked in Dresch’s lab last summer as part of Clark’s Interdisciplinary Summer Research Program. Working alongside Degen Larkin ’17, a biology major and math minor, Hossain created and applied mathematical models of gene expression, the process through which genetic information in DNA drives the synthesis of protein products. Gaiewski developed computer algorithms to test Hossain’s models.
“I want to get my Ph.D., and having experience in bioinformatics will help a lot,” says Gaiewski, a Traina Scholar. “It’s where math and science are going. What I’m doing is making what’s called parameter estimation algorithms so biologists can get data extremely accurately and extremely quickly.”
Meanwhile, Larkin ’17, also a Traina Scholar, says she learned a lot about math and computer science approaches from Gaiewski, Hossain and Dresch. “They were showing me how to write scripts,” she says. “It was great to be in a lab with biology, biochemistry, computer science and math experts.”
She admits that as a middle and high school biology teacher — her chosen career — she may not have to draw upon such bioinformatics skills or the extensive DNA research she conducted. But she already suspects she’ll profit from having presented and defended her research in Dresch and Drewell’s weekly team meetings.
“It’s incredibly beneficial to have been involved in a situation where I presented my research to other people; to think on my feet and trust in myself enough to say, ‘I’m confident in the results I got,’” she says. “Those types of skills are important in anything you do.”
Photo at top: Navid Al Hossain '18 works with Jacqueline Dresch, assistant professor of mathematics.