Kiran Asher

 

Associate Professor of International Development and Social Change, and Women’s Studies

 

My interdisciplinary training is grounded in two decades of field-based research in Latin America and South Asia. While my research interests are diverse they remain focused on the gendered and raced dimensions of social and environmental change in the global south. My approaches to these themes emerge from my analytical engagement with postcolonialism, feminism, and marxism, and my political commitment to social change. These commitments are also reflected in my teaching, mentoring, and in what I read (http://www.redwolfconspiracy.com) and write (http://kiranasher.blogspot.com).

 

 

Research and Publications

 

My research focuses on the complex, contradictory and constitutive connections between political economy, culture (including gender and race), and nature. In addition to regular conference papers (not listed here) and publications (listed below), I have written a book (Black and Green: Afro-Colombians, Development, and Nature in the Pacific Lowlands, Duke University Press, 2009). In this monograph, I argue that Afro-Colombians are neither neglected victims of development, nor heroes of a cultural, “environmentally friendly” alternative to development. Eschewing the many binaries—tradition vs. modernity, progress vs. underdevelopment, exploitation vs. resistance, local vs. global, theory vs. practice—that plague and limit thinking about third world development and environmental movements, my book disrupts the notion that development is a hegemonic, homogenizing force of western rationality. Through an ethnographic and historical account of black organizing in the Pacific lowlands, I show how struggles for positive social and environmental change are shaped differentially by and against local, national and global influences.

 

My new research project is a comparative study of the political economy of environmental conservation, and their raced and gendered dimensions. This project involves two elements: First, to reconceptualize and theorize human-nature relations by drawing on political-economic and feminist approaches in a postcolonial frame. Second, to conduct archival research and ethnographic fieldwork of environmental conservation policies in Colombia, and India, (and other Latin American locations).

 

While beginning work in India, I remain committed to Colombia (and Latin America in general). I am a regular at the meetings of the Latin American Studies Association (http://lasa.international.pitt.edu/), and a research associate of the Center for Latin American, Caribbean, and Latino Studies at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst (http://www.umass.edu/clacls/). Through the latter, I am engaged in collaborative research to explore and compare how the “environment” and environmental issues open, and circumscribe, new spaces for the expression of social, cultural and livelihood concerns of black and indigenous communities in Colombia and Chile. This collaborative work is conducted through a grant from the initiative on “Social Movements, Civic Participation, and Democratic Innovation: Interrogating the Civil Society Agenda” at UMASS (http://www.umass.edu/civsoc/Welcome.html)

 

 

Selected Publications

 

(2009). “Black and Green: Afro-Colombians, Development, and Nature in the Pacific Lowlands. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (http://www.dukeupress.edu/cgibin/forwardsql/search.cgi?template0=nomatch.htm&template2=books/book_detail_page.htm&user_id=24276&Bmain.item_option=1&Bmain.item=17249

2009. (Co-authored with Diana Ojeda). “Producing Nature and Making the State: Ordenamiento Territorial in the Pacific Lowlands of Colombia.” GeoForum 40 (3): 292-302.

(http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.014)

 

2007. “Ser y Tener: Black Women’s Activism, Development and Ethnicity in the Pacific Lowlands of Colombia.” Feminist Studies 33 (1): 11-37.

 

2004. ““Texts in Context": Afro-Colombian Women’s Activism in the Pacific Lowlands of Colombia.” Feminist Review vol. 78: 1-18

 

2004. ““Engenderando desenvolvimento e ethnicidade nas terras baixas do Pacífico colombiano” (Engendering Development and Ethnicity in the Pacific Lowlands of Colombia). Revista Estudos Feministas 12 (1): 15-45.

[Engendering development and ethnicity in the Pacific lowlands of Colombia. Rev. Estud. Fem. [online]. Jan./Apr. 2004, vol.12, no.1 [cited 01 December 2004], p.15-45. (http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-026X2004000100003&lng=en&nrm=iso)

 

2004. “Possibilities & Limits of Microfinance as a Development Strategy: A Conversation.” (With Veena Sampathkumar). Critical Half: (Annual Journal of Women for Women International) 2 (1): 8-13.

 

2000. "Mobilizing The Discourses Of Sustainable Economic Development And Biodiversity Conservation In The Pacific Lowlands Of Colombia." Strategies: A Journal of Theory, Culture and Politics. 13 (1): 111-125.

 

1996. ¿Etnicidad de Género o Género Etnico? (Ethnic gender or gendered ethnicity?). Boletín de Antropología 10 (26): 9-26. Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín.

 

Co-author with Erach Bharucha. 1993. Behaviour Patterns of the Blackbuck Antilope cervicapra under Suboptimal Habitat Conditions. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 90 (3): 371-393.

 

 

Academic Training and Professional Trajectory

 

I took my Ph.D. in Comparative Politics at the University of Florida (1998), and also obtained a graduate Certificate in Women’s Studies. Prior to my doctoral work, I took a Masters in Environmental Management at Duke University (1990). My undergraduate training was in the Life Sciences at St Xavier’s College, Bombay (1987).

 

Before arriving at Clark in 2002, I was a Rockefeller postdoctoral fellow (2001-2002) at the Institute for Research on Women at Rutgers University, NJ (http://irw.rutgers.edu/). I have also taught at Mount Holyoke College, MA (1997-1998) and Bates College, ME (1998-2001). In spring 2006, during my pre-tenure sabbatical from Clark, I returned to Mount Holyoke College as a research associate at the Five Colleges Women’s Studies Research Center (http://www.fivecolleges.edu/sites/fcwsrc/index.php). During my post tenure sabbatical, in spring 2009, I was in India on a Fulbright (http://www.fulbrightonline.org/) Indo-American Environmental Leadership Program fellowship.

 

I have carried out conservation-related fieldwork in India, China, the USA, and various Latin American countries including Colombia, worked as a biodiversity consultant for the World Bank (in 1991), and as a gender consultant for several Colombian NGOs (in 1995). More recently (in 2005), I served as outside “gender expert” to help a CARE-USA team develop and evaluate the research protocols for their “Strategic Impact Inquiry on Women’s Empowerment.” In summer 2008, I worked with the Julian Cho Society (JCS), a Maya social movement in southern Belize to link gender politics and indigenous land rights struggles.

 

 

Social Change

 

My commitment to social change is surely linked to having grown up in post-independence India. However, as a biologist trained in a postcolonial institution, for years I refused to allow myself to be ‘distracted’ by social and political issues; I kept my attention firmly focused on antelope and deer with the requisite ‘scientific distance.’ It was after year of graduate training and fieldwork (see above) that I came to understand that “theory” is central to my work, politics, and life. So while I understand the impulse to “do good” through “development” and “solving problems,” I find these impulses problematic at best and dangerous at worst. That is, I find that most development interventions, including those promoted through this department reinforce and replicate capitalist relations of power, and gender, colonial modes of knowledge.

 

To me, social change means engaging in the collective and political task of reconceptualizing new and just ways of engaging each other and the non-human world. While implicit within the notion of social change is the promise of something better for “humanity,” the task is neither technical nor innocent. In modern history colonialism, third world nationalisms, (post-World War II) developmentalism, Nazism, and socialism are among the endeavors launched to bring about social change through the application of science and reason. These endeavors have had checkered or disastrous consequences and raise questions about how the promises of doing good bear out in practice. Indeed, the civil rights, women’s rights, indigenous rights, labor rights, and environmental movements (among others) sought to redress the broken or unmet promises of prior attempts. Current movements for social change, including anti-racist, anti-imperialist, anti-sexist, feminist, developmental and environmental struggles bear the legacy of past ones and require (a) understanding the functioning and implications of existing arrangements of power and politics in specific contexts, and (b) imagining and constituting alternative and just society-nature relations.

 

My work in IDCE is:

 

·         To keep questions about social change and power in my/our teaching, research, and service agendas (I used to Coordinator the IDSC BA program and later the MA program)

·         To disrupt the idea that social change can be brought about through “quick fixes” to intractable problems. Put differently, development, environmental (including GIS), and community work is NOT, and CANNOT, be merely technical or practical. It is not free of or beyond social relations, history, and power.

·         To insist that working to “fix” developmental, environmental and community issues requires engaging history, politics, and social theory. That this work is linked to struggles for social change and requires hard work across time and space and comes “without guarantees.”

·         To critically engage “difference” (disciplinary, socio-cultural, politico-ideological, of race, gender and sexual orientation), build coalitions and be in solidarity with colleagues, students, and allies beyond the Department, University, and US academe

·         To recognize that there are different kinds of work linked to the above (academic knowledge production, program and institution building, activism, advocacy), and while they are interconnected they are not the same. Confusing them or assuming that one can do them all simultaneously and effectively is a fallacy I want to guard against.

 

 

Teaching Philosophy and Courses

 

Whether teaching development theories, gender studies, Latin American politics, the parameters of “modernity,” or the political economy of environmental conservation, I urge students to:

 

·         Eschew monocausal explanations of social and political phenomena (such as underdevelopment, colonialism) and simplistic, apolitical solutions to them,

·         Move beyond the many binaries that plague thinking about third world development (theory vs. practice; tradition vs. modernity; exploitation vs. resistance),

·         Think historically and analytically about the complex and contradictory nature of social, economic and political processes, and the multiplicity of power relations that underlie them, and

·         Be self-reflexive about their own learning and activism,

·         Discover the joys of reading and thinking critically.

 

What I teach at Clark (see Academic Catalog for course descriptions):

 

·         ID 125: Tales from the Far Side: Development and Underdevelopment in the Age of Globalization

·         ID/FYS 182: Are We Modern Yet? (Regular class or First year seminar)

·         ID209/ IDCE 353/WST 354: Beyond Victims and Guardian Angels: Third World Women, Gender and Economic Development

·         ID264/IDCE 30222: Advanced Topics in Development Theory: Fall 2008 topic: Colonialism and Development, previous topic: Conversations with the Ghost of Marx

·         ID269/IDCE30269/WS269: Raced Natures, Gendered Developments: Political Economy of Environmental Conservation

·         IDCE 360: Development Theory (aka Missionaries, Messiahs and Misfits: The History and Politics of Development Theory)

 

 

Mentoring

 

I believe that professional relationships among faculty, staff and students are imperative in order to foster learning, critical inquiry and mutual respect in the US academy. Many students first learn to become professionals in college and/or graduate school. A professional relationship with your professors is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition to finding faculty mentors. Be careful not to confuse mentorship with friendship. Faculty are not your peers, and many consider it an abuse of power relations to establish intimate social relations with students. The guidelines below are meant to help you become and recognize academic professionalism.

 

·         Emails as Professional Correspondences or Email Etiquette

·         Guidelines for seeking Letters of Recommendation

·         How to Handle the Challenges and Fun of a Masters

·         Guidelines and Checklist for Written Work or Professor Asher’s 20 Commandments!

·         Professor Asher’s Grading Criteria