I am generally interested in the dynamics of adaptive divergence following a population’s encounter with a new environment. In particular, I aim to understand how populations respond to new selective environments, and how individual variation in behavior and morphology influence the evolutionary journey a population takes when forced to adapt to those new challenges.
1) The role of phenotypic plasticity in adaptive divergence
An interest that stems from my graduate research with flexible bat echolocation is how phenotypic plasticity can influence adaptive divergence. When individuals encounter new environments, selection across generations is one mechanism by which phenotypes can change. Additionally, individual plasticity, which is quite common, may play an important role in allowing individuals to survive on the new adaptive landscape until selection can bring them to a new local fitness peak. A fascinating possibility is that the newly-expressed phenotypes may in part determine the course of future evolution, because a particular plastic response exposes particular phenotypes to selection. I, along with several members of our lab (John Baker, Sophie Valena, Justin Golub, Brendan Clancy and Susan Foster) are examining the role of ancestral plasticity in the evolution of benthic and limnetic ecotypes in stickleback fish. Our recent work has demonstrated that diet-induced plasticity in trophic morphology leads to phenotypes resembling divergent ecotypes. This plasticity is present in both marine stickleback, which represent the ancestral state of the radiation, as well as derived, freshwater populations. We are expanding this project to address questions regarding plasticity integration as well as interactions between environmentally-induced plasticity and ontogeny.
2) The effects of relaxed and reversed selection on the evolution of behavioral adaptations
When populations invade new habitats, they often encounter a reduced predator assemblage relative to their ancestral population. Because predators generally exert substantial selection on their prey, relaxed selection by some ancestral predators may result in the loss of adaptations specific to those predators. This is particularly intuitive when the adaptation in question is an otherwise costly morphological trait such as spines or armor. The consequences of relaxed selection on antipredator behavior, which may or may not be costly to maintain during a period of relaxed selection, is less clear (and therefore more interesting!). Furthermore, should a population re-encounter predators similar to those of their ancestor (reversed selection), how do the outcomes of relaxed selection constrain the response to reversed selection? To address these issues, I again turn to the threespine stickleback fish radiation, in which populations experience a variety of predator assemblages, including the loss of some ancestral predators (relaxed selection) and the re-introduction of ancestral predators (reversed selection). My work is supported in part by a postdoctoral research fellowship from the National Institutes of Health to explore these issues, and in particular, to determine the endocrine and genetic bases for population differences in behavior that result from differences in predator environment.
Previous Degrees
Awards and Fellowships
Publications
Wund, M. A., Baker, J. A., Clancy, B., Golub, J. & Foster, S. A. 2008. A test of the 'flexible stem' model of evolution: ancestral plasticity, genetic accommodation, and morphological divergence in the threespine stickleback radiation The American Naturalist. 172, 449-462.
Messler, A., M. A. Wund, J. A. Baker and S. A. Foster. 2007. The effects of relaxed and reversed selection by predators on the antipredator behavior of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Ethology. 113, 953-963.
Wund, M. A., M. E. Torocco, R. T. Zappalorti and H. K. Reinert. 2007. Activity ranges and habitat use of eastern kingsnakes, Lampropeltis getula getula, in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Northeastern Naturalist. 14, 343-360.
Wund, M. A. 2006. Variation in the echolocation calls of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in response to different habitats. American Midland Naturalist. 156, 99-108.
Wund, M. A. 2005. Learning and the development of habitat-specific bat echolocation. Animal Behaviour. 70, 441-450.
Vandermeer, J., M. A. Evans, P. Foster, T. Hook, M. Reiskind, and M. Wund. 2002. Increased competition may promote species coexistence. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99, 8731-8736.
Courses Taught
Lecturer, Clark University: Biodiversity for non-majors, Earth Systems Science for non-majors
Teaching Assistant, The University of Michigan: Evolution, Animal Behavior, Mammalogy, Animal Diversity, Introductory Biology