Discussion
Hard Corals
Soft Corals
Overall Diversity
Environmental
Stressors
Hard Corals
The causeway site has the lowest
mean D. strigosa, and statistically insignificant lower means for the
other two hard corals, following the trends recorded previously due to
human disturbance, low flow, sedimentation, increased heavy metal
availability, increased oxidative stress, and increased turbidity.
These study sites were conducted in
shallow waters, ranging from 4 meters to less then a meter deep. Jones
found that BBD (Black Band Disease) affects corals in shallow waters more
vehemently. Interestingly, D. labrynthiformis appears to be immune
to BBD in Bermuda, giving it
competitive advantage over the dominant D. strigosa. While deeper
terrace reefs are comprised of thriving D. strigosa in a 3:1 ratio
with their relative, D. labrynthiformis, the shallower lagoons
where disease is more prevalent (and we did our sampling) were shown to
have a much more even distribution of the two species (1:1). In addition,
little to no BBD has been recorded in Castle Harbor, despite the large
amount of death cataloged (Jones
2008).
Do the results conform to known
trends? D. strigosa is significantly less abundant in the
causeway, and D. labrynthiformis, while always at a much lower
density then D. strigosa, is highest in number at John Smith, where
another student in the class, Kasia, found the largest incidence of BBD.
Finally, while the causeway seems to be lacking one of the key hard coral
species, it still has mustard coral in abundance, making up the dominant
form of the coral cover. Thus, differential presence of key hard coral
species may not be the biggest contributors to coral density differences
seen in the data.
-top-
Soft
Corals
Plexaurella
sp. (common sea rod) followed the
expected trend for soft corals, it increased in mean density at the two
sites with higher flow rates. The absence of Gorgonia vantalina
from John Smith’s Bay could be due to disturbance such as hurricane
Fabian, or lack of colonization even prior to Fabian. This was the only
south shore site, if we could go collect more data I might find another
south shore site nearby, perhaps one less impacted by the hurricane, and
see if Gorgonia vantalina had colonized successfully. Finally, the
Briareum asbestinum (Corky
Sea fingers) were likely constant between all sites because their
population size was relatively low, even when overall biodiversity was
high.
|
|
John Smith's Bay
|
Whalebone Bay |
Causeway |
|
Hard Corals |
|
|
|
|
D. strigosa |
↑ |
↑ |
↓ |
|
D. Labyrinthiformis |
↑ |
↓ |
↓ |
|
Porites astreoides |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
|
Soft
Corals |
|
|
|
|
Gorgonia vantalina |
---------------- |
↑ |
↑ |
|
Plexaurella
sp. |
↑ |
↑ |
↓ |
|
Briareum asbestinum |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
|
Sum vector |
↑↑↑ |
↑↑ |
↓↓ |
-top-
Overall Diversity by Location
The stark difference in Shannon
evenness index for the Castle Harbor site, labeled “causeway”, is due to
the dominance of mustard coral. Mustard coral comprised 66.6 ± 26.2% of
the total individuals found at the causeway. This standard deviation marks
the differences between transects, it is particularly high because a few
transects were on points that received slightly more water movement and
therefore contained a bunching of fan and hairy rod corals. The mustard
coral also was the only coral found in 2 out of the 11 sites. Standard
deviation of causeway data is higher than for the other two sites because
there were 11 transects, while John Smiths and Whalebone had 6 and 4
transects, respectively.
The causeway has very
limited flow and increased sedimentation compared to the other sites, and
therefore is unsuitable habitat for most coral (Flood,
Pitt et al. 2005).
The site was covered in an overwhelming amount of dead
coral.
Wells bay is also in the harbor, so it
has less water movement compared to north rock. Wells is further from
pollution then the causeway and receives a bit more flow, leading to
increased amounts of corals in comparison. There was little sediment in
comparison to the causeway, but more than at any of the other sites.
There were fewer dead corals, suggesting that this area was less impacted
by the causeway construction and by the municipal pollution.
North rock had higher wave action then
wells, and was deeper then wells. It was also not within the harbor,
where anthropogenic forces have affected most reefs. While comparisons to
the density data are merely observational, it is interesting that north
rock had a higher index value then any other site, and the highest wave
action.
|
Physical Parameters Measured By Site |
| |
John Smith's Bay |
Whalebone Bay |
Castle Harbor: Causeway |
North Rock |
Castle Harbor: Wells Bay |
|
Water Depth |
4 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
|
.75 - 4.5 m |
.8 - 2 m |
.25 - 1 m |
2.4 - 6 m |
2 - 3.5 m |
|
Wave Action |
4 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
|
Pollution |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Natural Disturbance: Hurricane |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Disease |
BBD |
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity |
5 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
|
SHEI |
0.823 |
0.764 |
0.451 |
0.931 |
0.816 |
-top-
Discussion: Individual Environmental Stressors
Water
Flow
The diversity increased as the site
increased in relative measure of wave action. The three sites where I
measured biodiversity in density had increased in their SHEI as their wave
action increased. While the strength of waves was not quantified, it is
well known that the south shore receives considerably stronger waves then
the north, and that the causeway has created very constricted flow
comparatively in Castle Harbor
(Thomas 1985; Flood, Pitt et al. 2005).
The two other sites also have lower diversity with lower wave action, as
North Rock receives much stronger waves then Wells.
Depth
The overall diversity, measured by
Shannon evenness index, increased as the depth of the site increased. The
site depths peaked at 6 meters for North Rock, never reaching the peak 15
to 30 meters measured in literature.
Disturbance


Above: (L) Airport Dump (R) Causeway to the left of
the Airport
Photo Sources: (L) www.bermuda-online.org/environ.htm;
(R) news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3087296.stm
The most devastating disturbance
for biodiversity seems to be the construction of the causeway. While the
south shore was subjected to a massive hurricane, John Smith’s beach has
very high diversity and where there is a difference in individual coral
means, it has the highest (excepting the sea fan anomaly). However, the
causeway site was decimated due to the combination of physical factors
associated with its almost stagnant flow and increased pollution (it did
smell a little bit). The dead coral was covered in algae and there were
more sponges, but very few coral individuals. While Wells bay was also in
the Harbor, because of its location it received more movement and less
trash (the airport causeway blocked any bulk trash flow, and it was far
enough down current for diffusion to occur).