| Introduction
In rocky intertidal zones grazing by herbivores controls the
abundance and biomass of primary producers (Coleman et al., 2006). Grazing intensity therefore determines the
net productivity of a given system (Coleman et al., 2006). Prominent grazing
mollusks include limpets, pulmonate limpets, chitons, and multiple families of
snails (littorinids, trochids, neritids, and hydrobiids) (Little 1989). On many rocky shores limpets are the dominant
grazers and have considerable ecological importance (Davies et al., 2006). On European coasts limpets from the genus Patella are shown to control algal
assemblages (Coleman et al., 2006), which indirectly controls productivity. Johnson et al. (1998) determined that limpet
grazing on Fucus establishment
affected algal abundance and distribution patterns.
Understanding
the underlying mechanism of grazing control
requires studying foraging patterns and preferences of limpets.
Extensive studies have tracked the activity
of species in diverse areas of the world (Branch 1981; Hartnoll and
Wright 1977;
Williams et al., 1999; Garrity and Levings 1983; Gray and Hodgson 1998;
Davies
et al., 2006) and have found some widespread patterns. Homing, a
behavior in
which limpets inhabit a home scar that they return to after foraging
excursions,
occurs in many siphonarian and prosobranch limpets (Hartnoll and
Wright, 1977). Home scars are typically a small indentation
in rocks where the limpet shell grows to precisely match the rock shape
(Cook
1971; Hartnoll and Wright, 1977). Homing
serves three functions, varying in importance between species: (1) protection
against dessication and other abiotic factors, (2) protection from predators,
and (3) advantage in competition due to their familiarity with the surrounding
landscape (Garrity and Levings, 1983). Multiple methods for homing have been hypothesized and
studied, including: landmark orientation, reverse-something, something, and
following cues laid down by travelling limpets (cite siphonaria). The general consensus is that a type of
chemical trail, typically mucous, is laid down for limpet navigation, though
this hypothesis has not been conclusively tested (Hartnoll and Wright, 1977;
Cook 1971; Mackay and Underwood 1977).
Although much work has gone into understanding both the
factors that control foraging patterns as well as the mechanism limpets use to
home, the home scars themselves are rarely studied beyond their adaptive
functions. The process of home scar
selection has not been investigated, leaving such questions as what factors
make good home scars, how quickly a limpet establishes its home scar, and how
conspecifics compete for prime home scar space, unanswered. This study seeks to track the movements of
limpets in the species Patella vulgata
when displaced from their home scar and transferred to an unknown and
uninhabited tide pool. It follows the tendency of limpets to occupy the same
space after multiple days, as well as interspecific competition. | |
 Figure 1. Patella vulgata foraging Copyright Rodger Jackman http://www.arkive.org/common-limpet/patella- vulgata/info.html
 Figure 2. Fingernail limpets in their home scars at low tide. Copywright Genny Anderson
 Figure 3. A home scar without its fingernail limpet. Copywright Genny Anderson
|