![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
|
||
|
Seastar Biology The Study Bibliography and Weblinks
|
Geographic Distribution The northern seastar, Asterias vulgaris, is a predominant predator along the rocky intertidal coast of the Gulf of Maine. Conspecific with A. rubens, found in Europe and the British Isles, the two species are morphologically indistinguishable but could perhaps be ecologically and genetically isolated from one another (Franz et al. 1981). For this reason, American Atlantic populations of the northern seastar are known as A. vulgaris. The geographic range of A.vulgaris extends southward to Cape Hatteras off the coast of the Carolinas all the way northward to Labrador (Bousfield 1960), corresponding with a preferred temperature range between 6º-17ºC (Franz et al. 1981). Northern seastars are found throughout both the intertidal and subtidal regions and have been seen at depths exceeding 300 meters. Vertical distributions show juvenile seastars and small adults generally prefer the shallow water and intertidal areas whereas large adults (>20 meters) are mainly found on soft bottoms at greater depths (Himmelman & Dutil 1991). Seastars as a keystone predator Seastars
are voracious intertidal predators and have been documented as a determining
factor in patterns of distribution, abundance and diversity within low
intertidal habitats (Lubchenco & Menge 1978). A. vulgaris plays an
important role as a keystone species in the North Atlantic rocky intertidal
by restricting the growth and distribution of the mussel, Mytilus edulis,
the dominant competitor in the Atlantic rocky intertidal zone. In the
absence of A. vulgaris mussels outcompete all other organisms in the
lower intertidal and subtidal regions and the lower edge of the mussel zone
is extended into deeper waters. The presence of A. vulgaris limits
the mussel zone to higher in the intertidal, at heights where the seastars
cannot feed due to prolonged emersion. By removing mussels, seastars
encourage biodiversity in the lower intertidal by allowing other organisms,
such as barnacles and seaweeds, to settle in areas otherwise occupied by
mussel beds. Seastar
abundance fluctuates seasonally due to inshore migration in summer to feed
on mussels and offshore migration during winter months, presumably to avoid
severe wave conditions in shallow waters of the subtidal region (Menge
1979). In a comparative study between the seastars A. vulgaris and
Leptasterias polaris, another seastar found in the Gulf of Maine, it
was found that following harsh winter conditions numerous individuals of
L. polaris had scars on the aboral surface, possibly caused by ice
abrasion, whereas A. vulgaris observed at the same time and depth had
no damage. This evidence along with a noted seasonal migration in one year
of study suggests that A. vulgaris tends to migrate to greater depths
during winter months (Gaymer et al. 2001) in order to avoid the harsh
environmental factors that occur in winter. Environmental conditions moreso
than predation are thought to be the limiting factor in the abundance and
distribution patterns of A. vulgaris. Predation on A. vulgaris
is unlikely to be a limiting factor since predators are uncommon and
probably limited to other seastars (Himmelman 1991). The objective of this study was to survey the rocky intertidal zone at Nahant to better understand the abundance and distribution patterns of the northern seastar, Asterias vulgaris. It seems evident from the literature that seastars occur in low numbers across the rocky intertidal (Gaymer et al. 2001) and tend to migrate into deeper waters with the onset of winter to avoid environmental stress. This study sought to explore this paradigm by recording seastar abundances and distributions over a three-month period (September to November) during monthly visits to the rocky intertidal. As previous studies have suggested, I expected that the abundance of seastars in the intertidal would decrease in numbers as the months passed. I also hypothesized that from the month of September to the month of November, seastars would be more frequently seen in tidal pools and sheltered habitats as opposed to the exposed rocky shore, since water temperatures fluctuate less dramatically and are warmer than the ambient air temperature during winter months.
|
|