Evaluation

Experiments
 

Results
 

Future Study

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Experiments
In the experiment comparing color morphology to substrate, the colors were combined from 6 color categories into 3 for statistical analysis.  This method helped to find relationships between more general color groupings with substrata but also may have concealed any possible patterns present between all the various color groupings.  Though this method was used in Wilbur and Steneck (1999), my definition of dark ("dark complex" according to Wilbur Steneck 1999), green, and yellow groups probably differed.  I grouped red brown and light brown along with dark brown into the "dark" category.  The red brown color morphs I encountered in Nahant were of a dark rusty or maroon red and some were a mix of red and brown.  They seemed best suited to the "dark" group.  I did not encounter many light brown color morphs.  Their appearance seemed to vary between brown and grey with green, so some light brown morphs may have been categorized as dark brown or olive green, depending upon lighting conditions.  The "green" category was simply olive green color morphs.  These were very abundant and were more distinguishable than the ambiguous "dark" groups.  The "yellow" category included greenish yellow morphs because, while they may not have been pure yellow, they were much lighter in color than the other groups with some having patches of both yellow and light green.

Color assessment can be problematic due its subjectivity.  Wilbur and Steneck (1999) used a color chart for visual analyses as well as an additional computer imaging program to help standardize color determinations.  Some type of color chart in the field may help ameliorate problems with subjective color identification.  Also, color appearance can differ depending on whether the shell is wet or dry and should probably be sprayed with water before sorting.
Since L. obtusata are famous for their camouflage, finding them during sampling can be difficult.  The longer the search, the more may be found.  Especially if information on snail density is desired, a standard search time should be set for each sample area. 

The snail mobility experiment may not have resulted in conclusive data, but its failure leads to some interesting considerations.  Because it was raining on the day the experiment was conducted, the nail enamel used to mark the snails may not have dried before being smeared off by handling or movement of the snail.  Indeed, this was observed during the process.  Second, the experiment can only show whether or not snails remain upon the same alga.  It does not show if snails moved between algal and rock substrata or from alga to alga, nor if they do this by choice or are tossed about by wave action.

Standardizing snail search time may also be important for dimensional data.  If the search is short, larger individuals may be found while smaller individuals are overlooked.  Different dimensions may also reflect the age of the snail instead of ecological factors determining their size. 


Results
Results for shell color verses substrata indicate a greater proportion of dark morphs upon rock surfaces with proportionately lighter morphs on Ascophyllum.  In Wilbur and Steneck (1999), differential color morph distributions were seen relative to exposed and protected sites where the color of Ascophyllum also differed.  Here, I attempted a similar comparison using different substrata instead of multiple sites. 
Differential shell coloration may be due to many factors.  One hypothesis states that shell color variation is maintained by selection from predation (Wilbur and Steneck 1999).  This seems probable from strong evidence that the introduction of the green crab over that last century has caused a significant increase in snail shell thickness (Bertness 2001).  However, an increase in shell thickness due to phenotypic plasticity instead of selection on genes is thought to also contribute to the morphological differences (Trussell 1996).  However, trade offs have been shown to exist between shell thickness and body size (Trussell 2000, Trussell and Nicklin 2002) but may be worth the expense to avoid predation.  Although it is possible that these inducible defenses have evolved as opposed to genetically based phenotypes because of trade offs with body size (Trussell and Smith 2000).
Another hypothesis is varying color morphs are due to food consumed by the snail.  This may be possible to some extent, especially in altering the degree of color intensity, but most findings seem to indicate a majority of genetically based cases (Etter 1988).  Overall, there were more snails on Ascophyllum than on rock substrate (88 vs. 28 individuals).  This could be caused by greater food quantities available on Ascophyllum
Shell color may also be due to closely linked character traits with other traits that selection acts upon.  Etter (1988) was able to show that brown color morphs of Nucella lapillus were selected upon more heavily by the physiological stress of desiccation at protected sites than white morphs.  Finally, color morphology may have evolved locally because of the low dispersal ability of L. obtusata's direct development of offspring.

In Wilbur and Steneck (1999), yellow morphs of L. obtusata were shown to be smaller than darker morphs.  Additionally, at the exposed site where Ascophyllum was said to be darker in color, yellow morphs were less abundant.  There is little evidence that the size a shell attains changes their adhesive ability since a larger foot size is more useful for adhesion (Trussell 1997).  This suggests that dark color morphologies may have no advantage in that respect if the color morphs were found to be different sizes on average.
Yet, the dimension data of this study shows no significant difference in dimensions between  the color morphs.  Thus, the hypothesis that larger, light-colored morphs might experience increased predation was not supported.  Differences in color morph size as found in Wilbur and Steneck (1999) may have reflected the age of the snails sampled or other temporal factors such as time of year.

Future Study
Possible future studies may include comparing L. obtusata morphologies at protected and exposed sites.  Since I focused my study in one area, there may be differences if more area is examined.  Additional studies could also address snail size verses substrate which was not explored in this study.  Also, a more cleverly designed snail mobility experiment could be performed-  one allowing nail polish to dry thoroughly and perhaps marking snails found on rock substrate with a different color.  Still, few individuals may be recovered if wave action greatly upsets the snails.